GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon R9 M385
When comparing GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R9 M385, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R9 M385 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon R9 M385
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 260 has 892 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385.
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 260 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M385 is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
5−6
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
170−180
medium / 768p
95−100
140−150
ultra / 1080p
45−50
75−80
QHD / 1440p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
30−33
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
medium / 768p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
4−5
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
−
60−65
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
2−3
7−8
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
21−24
medium / 1080p
3−4
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
100−105
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
20−22
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
18−20
35−40
medium / 768p
12−14
24−27
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
27−30
high / 768p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon R9 M385
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN
Code name
GT200
Strato
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
16 June 2015
Pipelines
192
896
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
56.00
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
1,792 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.3
OpenGL
2.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
Not Listed
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price