GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M385
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M385. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M385. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M385 is 393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 188% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200 | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M