GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M385
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M385, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Radeon R9 M385, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M385 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M385 is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M385 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M385. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M385 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200B | Strato |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 56.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,792 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce 945M
- Radeon R9 M385 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book 940M GDDR5
- Radeon R9 M385 vs GeForce 945M