Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R9 M385

In this comparison between Quadro K1000M and Radeon R9 M385 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K1000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Radeon R9 M385 Check Price

Quadro K1000M and Radeon R9 M385 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro K1000M and Radeon R9 M385 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M or Radeon R9 M385 here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Radeon R9 M385 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon R9 M385
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M385 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M385 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K1000M.
Quadro K1000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M385 - in Laptops.
Quadro K1000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M385 - with GCN.
Quadro K1000M and Radeon R9 M385 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	24−27
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385.
low / 768p	60−65	170−180
medium / 768p	27−30	140−150
ultra / 1080p	7−8	75−80
QHD / 1440p	−	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−33
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	10−11	75−80
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
high / 1080p	−	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	80−85
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Fortnite is 272% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
low / 768p	18−20	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	21−24
medium / 1080p	−	9−10
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	100−105
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	20−22
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	0−1	35−40
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	14−16	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
high / 768p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro K1000M	Radeon R9 M385
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Code name	N14P-Q1	Strato
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2012	16 June 2015
Pipelines	192	896
Core clock speed	850 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	13.60	56.00
Floating-point performance	326.4 gflops	1,792 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	76.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	10 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
TrueAudio		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K1000M vs Radeon R9 M385

Quadro K1000M and Radeon R9 M385 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares