FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M385X
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M385X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M385X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 150 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3300 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 78% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 108% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Strato-XT-M3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |