FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M385X
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M385X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M385X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 342% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tahiti | Strato-XT-M3 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |