FirePro W5100 vs Radeon R9 M385X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W5100 stacks up against Radeon R9 M385X, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W5100
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 170 MHz higher, than FirePro W5100.
- FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Radeon R9 M385X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 67% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 85% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 73% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Bonaire | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |