GeForce 820A vs Radeon R9 M385X
When choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M385X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M385X.
GeForce 820A
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 325 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 820A is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 83% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GF117 | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |