GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M385X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M385X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M385X.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M385X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 393 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200 | Strato-XT-M3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |