GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M385X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M385X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M385X.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M385X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 472 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M385X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2508 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M385X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK106 | Strato-XT-M3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 16 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |