Radeon HD 4810 vs Radeon R9 M385X
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4810 and Radeon R9 M385X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4810 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M385X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4810
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4810 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M385X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4810 has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- Radeon HD 4810 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M385X - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4810 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M385X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 475 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4810.
- Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M385X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4810 is 2100 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4810 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 4810. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | − | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 140% more, than Radeon HD 4810. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 4810 | Radeon R9 M385X | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
Code name | RV770 | Strato-XT-M3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 28 May 2009 | 16 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 800.0 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 246 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |