Radeon R9 M385X vs Tesla M2070 Q
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M385X and Tesla M2070 Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M385X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M2070 Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon R9 M385X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M385X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M385X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M385X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M385X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M385X.
- Radeon R9 M385X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M385X is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M385X is 526 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon R9 M385X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1632 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M385X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M385X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Fortnite is 24% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Minecraft is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M385X in World of Tanks is 21% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M385X | Tesla M2070 Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Strato-XT-M3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |