FirePro S7150 vs Radeon R9 M390
When comparing FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M390, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M390 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7150
Radeon R9 M390 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390 - with GCN.
- FirePro S7150 and Radeon R9 M390 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7150 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tonga | Pitcairn |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2016 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 117.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 242 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |