GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R9 M390
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M390, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M390.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon R9 M390 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M390 - with GCN.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon R9 M390 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Far Cry 5 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Fortnite is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF104 | Pitcairn |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 242 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |