Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R9 M390
When comparing Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M390, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon R9 M390 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon R9 M390 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390 - with GCN.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Battlefield 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 163% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Fortnite is 282% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Metro Exodus is 3600% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1500% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1400% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in World of Tanks is 94% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon R9 M390 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Pitcairn |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 242 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |