Radeon R9 M390 vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between Radeon R9 M390 and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R9 M390 and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
Radeon R9 M390 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390.
- Radeon R9 M390 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Radeon R9 M390 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| Radeon R9 M390 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Far Cry 5 is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| Radeon R9 M390 and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390 | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Pitcairn | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5000 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 143.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 242 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |