FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 M390X
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 227 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Pitcairn | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |