GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 M390X
When comparing GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M390X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon R9 M390X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 56 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 97% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF114 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon R9 M390X vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon R9 M390X vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R7 370
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon R7 370
- Radeon R9 M390X vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti