GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M390X
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M390X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M390X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M390X is 95 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 318% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 172% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 420% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 322% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
Code name | GK106 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |