P104 100 vs Radeon R9 M390X
In this comparison between P104 100 and Radeon R9 M390X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P104 100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M390X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- P104 100 and Radeon R9 M390X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- P104 100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- P104 100 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 884 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- P104 100 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M390X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| P104 100 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| P104 100 and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
Full Specs
| P104 100 | Radeon R9 M390X | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3 |
| Code name | GP104 | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 December 2017 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 208.0 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |