Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R9 M390X
When choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M390X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M390X.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M390X has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M390X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M390X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M390X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 7 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 512% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R9 M390X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 293% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 475% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 213% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 766% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 52% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 542% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R9 M390X | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Oland | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 June 2016 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |