Radeon R9 M390X vs Radeon Sky 500
When comparing Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Sky 500
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M390X | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 227 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon R9 M390X and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. |
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M390X | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 9 June 2015 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 950 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |