Radeon R9 M390X vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M390X will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 310 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M390X in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |