Radeon R9 M390X vs Tesla M6
When comparing Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M6, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M6 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M6
Radeon R9 M390X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M390X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M390X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M390X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 207 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M390X.
- Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 75% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M390X and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 87% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M390X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M390X | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Amethyst (XT) / Tonga | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 9 June 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1180 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |