GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 206 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M395 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2758 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK106 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |