Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M395

In this comparison between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro 2000M Check Price

Radeon R9 M395 Check Price

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M or Radeon R9 M395 here:

Quadro 2000M Laptops

Radeon R9 M395 Laptops

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M395
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 284 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	1−2	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	60−65
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	250−260
medium / 768p	27−30	220−230
ultra / 1080p	7−8	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	−	70−75
high / 768p	16−18	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	21−24	180−190
medium / 1080p	0−1	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	0−1	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	0−1	100−110
medium / 1080p	0−1	65−70
low / 768p	18−20	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	0−1	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	75−80	130−140
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	0−1	130−140
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	−	45−50
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	16−18
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
high / 768p	12−14	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Quadro 2000M.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000M	Radeon R9 M395
Architecture	Fermi	GCN
Code name	Fermi
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2011	9 June 2015
Pipelines	192	1792
Core clock speed	550 MHz	834 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.60
Floating-point performance	422.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.1	Not Listed
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	2.1
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	27 Mh/s	336 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized	large
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
TrueAudio		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 M395

Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 M395 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares