Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 M395
When comparing Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M395, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M395 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 232 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 834 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5000 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | + |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |