Radeon HD 4830 vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 4830 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4830
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4830 has 508 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
- Radeon HD 4830 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- Radeon HD 4830 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 259 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4830.
- Radeon HD 4830 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4830 is 550 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 216% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 4830 and Radeon R9 M395 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 2200% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4830. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 4830 | Radeon R9 M395 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 21 October 2008 | 9 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 834 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 736.0 gflops | |
| Length | 246 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | + |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |