Radeon R9 M395 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
Radeon R9 M395
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395.
Radeon R9 M395 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
Radeon R9 M395 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395 is 260 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Radeon R9 M395 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1882 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
Radeon R9 M395 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
Radeon R9 M395
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
9 June 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1792
448
Core clock speed
834 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
5000 Million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1250 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
Not Listed
1.1
Vulkan
+
N/A
CUDA
2.0
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
336 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price
