FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S10000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S10000
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 102 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Amethyst XT |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 16 October 2014 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |