FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When comparing FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M395X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 M395X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro V5800
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 237% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 33 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 269% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 188% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 266% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 160% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 316% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 80% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 211% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 276% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Juniper | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |