FirePro W8100 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M395X.
FirePro W8100
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 13% more power consumption, than FirePro W8100.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 101 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 48% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Hawaii | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |