GeForce 840A vs Radeon R9 M395X
When comparing GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 M395X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 M395X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 840A
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 657% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 306 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce 840A is 752 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 372% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 153% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 385% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 375% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 215% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 390% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 3 |
Code name | GM108 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |