GeForce GT 745A vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M395X.
GeForce GT 745A
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 657% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 745A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 745A.
- GeForce GT 745A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GT 745A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 114 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 745A is 550 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 433% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 745A and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 560% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 276% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 410% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 192% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 625% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 52% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 425% more, than GeForce GT 745A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than GeForce GT 745A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 745A | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3 |
Code name | GK107 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 26 August 2013 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.28 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 26 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |