GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 750 Ti will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon R9 M395X
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
250 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 M395X has 316% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon R9 M395X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 297 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 1245 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
10−12
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
80−85
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
240−250
medium / 768p
200−210
210−220
ultra / 1080p
120−130
130−140
QHD / 1440p
90−95
100−110
4K / 2160p
50−55
60−65
high / 768p
160−170
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
140−150
medium / 1080p
70−75
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
QHD / 1440p
14−16
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
80−85
medium / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
ultra / 1080p
16−18
21−24
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Radeon R9 M395X
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 3
Code name
GM107
Amethyst XT
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
18 February 2014
16 October 2014
Pipelines
640
2048
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
723 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
92.54
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
2,961 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Not Listed
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
413 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
