HD Graphics P630 vs Radeon R9 M395X
In this comparison between HD Graphics P630 and Radeon R9 M395X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people HD Graphics P630 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
HD Graphics P630
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 1566% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1736 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- HD Graphics P630 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 380% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 101% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 236% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 410% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 231% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 625% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 425% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 3 |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 August 2016 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 24 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |