Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M395X
When choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395X.
Quadro CX
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M395X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Quadro CX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 121 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M395X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 350 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 642% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 170% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Quadro CX and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 373% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 612% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 293% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 1350% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 880% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
Quadro CX | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | GT200B | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GTX 760
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 760