Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon R9 M395X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Radeon R9 M395X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri stacks up against Radeon R9 M395X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 3 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 103% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 75% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 150% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 214% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 135% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 257% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 154% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 3 |
Code name | Kaveri Spectre | Amethyst XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 14 January 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | - |
DirectX | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | |
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 760
- Radeon R9 M395X vs Radeon R9 M485X
- Radeon R9 M395X vs GeForce GTX 760