Radeon R9 M395X vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395X has 5% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M395X is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M395X has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M395X is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M395X is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M395X is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 240−250 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M395X and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Far Cry 5 is 34% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Fortnite is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Grand Theft Auto V is 27% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M395X | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst XT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 October 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 413 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| TrueAudio | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Check Price |