FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R9 M470
When comparing FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M470, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M470 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S10000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M470.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 175 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and Radeon R9 M470 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 2 |
Code name | Tahiti | Saturn |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- Radeon R9 M470 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- Radeon R9 M470 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Radeon R9 M470 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Radeon R9 M470 vs GeForce GTX 950A