GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 M470
When choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M470, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M470.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M470 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M470 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 296 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M470.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M470 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 4893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R9 M470 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Dota 2 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Fortnite is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Metro Exodus is 366% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 2 |
| Code name | GT200 | Saturn |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |