Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 M470
When choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M470, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M470.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 M470 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M470 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470 - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M470 - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 333 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 M470 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K2200M | Radeon R9 M470 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2 |
| Code name | GM107 | Saturn |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 19 July 2014 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 48.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |