Radeon R9 M470 vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between Radeon R9 M470 and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 M470 will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M60
Radeon R9 M470 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M470 | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M470.
- Radeon R9 M470 is used in Laptops, and Tesla M60 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M470 is build with GCN 2 architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 443 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- Radeon R9 M470 and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470 is 988 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 214% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 212% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 230% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 153% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M470. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M470 | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | GCN 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Saturn | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 14 May 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |