GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M470X
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M470X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 M470X.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 M470X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M470X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M470X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M470X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M470X - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 142 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M470X.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M470X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470X is 5001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Battlefield 5 is 245% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Forza Horizon 4 is 241% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 M470X | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 2 |
Code name | GT200B | Emerald |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 240 | 896 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 2,080 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |