GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M470X
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M470X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M470X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon R9 M470X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M470X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M470X here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M470X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M470X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M470X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M470X - with GCN 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M470X is 472 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon R9 M470X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M470X is 1992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Battlefield 5 is 227% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M470X in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon R9 M470X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 2 |
| Code name | GK106 | Emerald |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,971 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |