FirePro M4150 vs Radeon R9 M485X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M485X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M485X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro M4150
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M485X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 129% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 306% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Opal | Amethyst |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |