FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M485X
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M485X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M485X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB MB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 40% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 177 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M485X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Amethyst |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |