GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 M485X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M485X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti stacks up against Radeon R9 M485X, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 807 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 44% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | − | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M485X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3 |
Code name | TU117 | Amethyst |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | no data | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 723 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |