Quadro 2000D vs Radeon R9 M485X
When comparing Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M485X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M485X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000D
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB MB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M485X has 303% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R9 M485X has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- Quadro 2000D is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 98 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
- Quadro 2000D is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M485X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M485X is 2400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000D.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 500% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 2000D and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 129% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 306% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 250% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Quadro 2000D. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Quadro 2000D. |
Full Specs
Quadro 2000D | Radeon R9 M485X | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3 |
Code name | GF106 | Amethyst |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 5 October 2011 | 14 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 192 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,170 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 20.00 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 178 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |