Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon R9 M485X
In this comparison between Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M485X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R7 M270DX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M485X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R9 M485X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M485X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M485X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Interface | IGP | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB MB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R7 M270DX is connected by IGP, and Radeon R9 M485X uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M485X - in Laptops.
- Radeon R7 M270DX is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M485X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 177 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M485X.
- Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M485X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 483% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Battlefield 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R7 M270DX and Radeon R9 M485X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 140−150 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Dota 2 is 129% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Far Cry 5 is 725% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Fortnite is 294% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Forza Horizon 4 is 485% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Grand Theft Auto V is 293% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Metro Exodus is 866% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 111% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M485X in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R7 M270DX | Radeon R9 M485X | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3 |
| Code name | Topaz | Amethyst |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 June 2014 | 14 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 723 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.56 | 92.54 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |